Unfair situation in Straight
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
11:46 Thu 28 Jan 10 (GMT)
[Link]
in torny I just had at least a 37 run, but because my opponent left I went through and it wiped it didn't count, what a joke, so unfair, why the hell wasn't there a carry on or at least have the 37 before he left allowed to stand!!!!
Edited at 17:51 Thu 28/01/10 (GMT)
Edited at 17:51 Thu 28/01/10 (GMT)
Edited at 17:51 Thu 28/01/10 (GMT)
Edited at 17:51 Thu 28/01/10 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:42 Thu 28 Jan 10 (GMT)
[Link]
The 37 should stand, but i presume he's updated the straight tourny so you can't carry on your run once the opponent has left. It's the same as snooker.
13:06 Thu 28 Jan 10 (GMT)
[Link]
yeah, I know the carry on has been stopped, but my 37 should stand, instead I was just told I won by the other player getting DQ'd for leaving
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:37 Thu 28 Jan 10 (GMT)
[Link]
Why has the carry on been stopped, I think the carry on should be in ALL game types. Opponents may leave a game when you've won in straight because they have a tournie invite and you could be on a big run, but it doesn't count because they left?
Seems silly to me
Seems silly to me
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:38 Thu 28 Jan 10 (GMT)
[Link]
The consolation is your highest run being 43, so it's not like the 37 would have appeared on your profile anyway.
On a personal note i don't like the notion of every round in a straight tournament being completed (Except one) and 20+ people (Example) having to wait for a player alone in a room going for a personal best. This could easily be the case if runs were allowed to continue and would mean every round going the distance time wise.
I'm also pretty much against the idea of uncompleted runs being counted as a highest run on profile.
On a personal note i don't like the notion of every round in a straight tournament being completed (Except one) and 20+ people (Example) having to wait for a player alone in a room going for a personal best. This could easily be the case if runs were allowed to continue and would mean every round going the distance time wise.
I'm also pretty much against the idea of uncompleted runs being counted as a highest run on profile.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:17 Thu 28 Jan 10 (GMT)
[Link]
All of of sudden everyones wearing clown outfits. Where did they come from?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:48 Thu 28 Jan 10 (GMT)
[Link]
there was no need for this post tea, if your going to use the forum at least add your veiws on the thread you have posted on
tea_ said:
All of of sudden everyones wearing clown outfits. Where did they come from?
there was no need for this post tea, if your going to use the forum at least add your veiws on the thread you have posted on
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:04 Thu 28 Jan 10 (GMT)
[Link]
Thank you
Edited at 00:08 Fri 29/01/10 (GMT)
Edited at 00:08 Fri 29/01/10 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
09:13 Wed 3 Feb 10 (GMT)
[Link]
You messaged me adidas
It was in the wrong place
It was meant for moshi monsters
Sorry
It was in the wrong place
It was meant for moshi monsters
Sorry
11:02 Wed 3 Feb 10 (GMT)
[Link]
Or is it not obvious enough that it becomes a 1-0 like all the other tournys and let the person carry on their run until they get the invite for next round so they can decide if they want a higher run or leave to play the next game (ending not losing their run)
And why? people have got the runs fair and square (and in fact would be getting higher so no reason why it shouldn't
britannia said:
The consolation is your highest run being 43, so it's not like the 37 would have appeared on your profile anyway.
On a personal note i don't like the notion of every round in a straight tournament being completed (Except one) and 20+ people (Example) having to wait for a player alone in a room going for a personal best. This could easily be the case if runs were allowed to continue and would mean every round going the distance time wise.
I'm also pretty much against the idea of uncompleted runs being counted as a highest run on profile.
On a personal note i don't like the notion of every round in a straight tournament being completed (Except one) and 20+ people (Example) having to wait for a player alone in a room going for a personal best. This could easily be the case if runs were allowed to continue and would mean every round going the distance time wise.
I'm also pretty much against the idea of uncompleted runs being counted as a highest run on profile.
Or is it not obvious enough that it becomes a 1-0 like all the other tournys and let the person carry on their run until they get the invite for next round so they can decide if they want a higher run or leave to play the next game (ending not losing their run)
And why? people have got the runs fair and square (and in fact would be getting higher so no reason why it shouldn't
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
11:19 Wed 3 Feb 10 (GMT)
[Link]
The reason it's disabled to carry on after is to stop you getting DQ'ed. It's been argued to change it back for a while now on snooker and it doesn't seem it will in the near future at all.
12:30 Wed 3 Feb 10 (GMT)
[Link]
I don't mind that in the least, great idea in my opinion, and I don't mind not having the "follow on", I just want my announcement
dame said:
The reason it's disabled to carry on after is to stop you getting DQ'ed. It's been argued to change it back for a while now on snooker and it doesn't seem it will in the near future at all.
I don't mind that in the least, great idea in my opinion, and I don't mind not having the "follow on", I just want my announcement
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:05 Wed 3 Feb 10 (GMT)
[Link]
What nick just said on snooker.
It should credit you though the run you're on. Bit unfair that is.
nick said:
Apart from the reasons mentioned above people getting disqualified when trying to continue the break were much more numerous and vocal on the forum.
It shouldn't be changed back to protect breaks for high-break scoring minority who are aware of the different rules applying to tournaments.
It shouldn't be changed back to protect breaks for high-break scoring minority who are aware of the different rules applying to tournaments.
What nick just said on snooker.
It should credit you though the run you're on. Bit unfair that is.
| Unable to post | |
|---|---|
| Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Unfair situation in Straight
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.