when you open a table you don't own it anymore
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
05:20 Mon 11 Aug 08 (BST) [Link]
When you open a table now and say a trouble maker comes to it you have to click start or quit. If you click quit , then the trouble maker invites his friends to the room and takes it away from you. It would be really nice to have a boot button, I think that would solve that problem.
Edited at 10:22 Mon 11/08/08 (BST)
Edited at 10:22 Mon 11/08/08 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
05:36 Mon 11 Aug 08 (BST) [Link]
It would but then i think the boot button would be used stupidly..
05:54 Mon 11 Aug 08 (BST) [Link]
Been said many times, but leaving the room is exactly the same as booting and can't be abused.
If you encounter a troublesome user, you can use the send complaint feature and put them on ignore, that way they can't bother you again and will be dealt with in due course.
Edited at 10:55 Mon 11/08/08 (BST)
If you encounter a troublesome user, you can use the send complaint feature and put them on ignore, that way they can't bother you again and will be dealt with in due course.
Edited at 10:55 Mon 11/08/08 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:57 Sat 16 Aug 08 (BST) [Link]
Well they can bother you !
becuase you could be playing a game and they could just start again !
becuase you could be playing a game and they could just start again !
10:58 Sat 16 Aug 08 (BST) [Link]
If you put them on ignore, you can't see anything they say..
12:42 Sat 16 Aug 08 (BST) [Link]
Can't really let people boot other players... despite how useful it indeed would be on occasion, it would 100.0% certainly be misused.
The only thing I *would* support in this direction is the ability for game owners to boot spectators. Spectators should, imo, be allowed in a game on the game owner's discretion. Sure, ignore addresses that issue as well, but it would be a more "right" solution to have them booted if the active players don't want them there.
Booting active players tho is out of the question imo.
Edited at 17:45 Sat 16/08/08 (BST)
The only thing I *would* support in this direction is the ability for game owners to boot spectators. Spectators should, imo, be allowed in a game on the game owner's discretion. Sure, ignore addresses that issue as well, but it would be a more "right" solution to have them booted if the active players don't want them there.
Booting active players tho is out of the question imo.
Edited at 17:45 Sat 16/08/08 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:20 Sat 16 Aug 08 (BST) [Link]
Surely that would be misused also?
I think there are a few players who don't play much and just watch friends, and they might not be able to do that because of the users that would misuse the option.
Also in tournaments one of the users is classed as the game owner and this may well cut out the support people recieve in tournaments, which would be a real shame, especially when you have the ignore option in place which comparamises for both parties
janmb said:
Can't really let people boot other players... despite how useful it indeed would be on occasion, it would 100.0% certainly be misused.
The only thing I *would* support in this direction is the ability for game owners to boot spectators. Spectators should, imo, be allowed in a game on the game owner's discretion. Sure, ignore addresses that issue as well, but it would be a more "right" solution to have them booted if the active players don't want them there.
Booting active players tho is out of the question imo.
The only thing I *would* support in this direction is the ability for game owners to boot spectators. Spectators should, imo, be allowed in a game on the game owner's discretion. Sure, ignore addresses that issue as well, but it would be a more "right" solution to have them booted if the active players don't want them there.
Booting active players tho is out of the question imo.
Surely that would be misused also?
I think there are a few players who don't play much and just watch friends, and they might not be able to do that because of the users that would misuse the option.
Also in tournaments one of the users is classed as the game owner and this may well cut out the support people recieve in tournaments, which would be a real shame, especially when you have the ignore option in place which comparamises for both parties
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:27 Sat 16 Aug 08 (BST) [Link]
why does everything have to be changed, its fine as it is. setting up another room takes around 10 secs lol.
15:38 Sat 16 Aug 08 (BST) [Link]
i disagree with booting people but i can emphasise with the thread title.
i now just room hop til i find someone to play
i now just room hop til i find someone to play
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:24 Sat 16 Aug 08 (BST) [Link]
heard so many times they've already put limits on the game so if they are around that ranking why not play them? if they give abuse ignore em- that way you still play the game maintain the room and earn points
| Unable to post | |
|---|---|
| Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
when you open a table you don't own it anymore
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.