I was thinking that the killer ranking system ain't that good..

So why not do it in Centuries - what i mean is you get 10,000 killer points you get a Century and it will be added to your profile

It would be better to add a more advanced rank to it so the up and coming players on killer can also be in the leader boards

I think this would be fair as new players join they ain't got a chance to get in the top 50 if someone been playing killer for a year or two

Your thoughts? (if you know what i mean. i haven't had no sleep so i might not make scene at the moment

a century is a 100 though?

Edited at 16:38 Thu 10/07/08 (BST)

I was just giving an example but a century is 100

Edited at 16:37 Thu 10/07/08 (BST)

Course you aren't making sense if you spell sense like scene.

I see no problem with the killer point system. Yes, the total points as such is a pretty useless number and one new players can never compete with, then again, of all the killer tables, total points is by far the least interesting.

That is why we added points per game, pot success and safety success. All those are percentages any new player can compete against as soon as passing the minimum requirements to game/pot numbers.

A weighted ranking system more similar to the other game types would obviously been an alternative, but I don't see any real need for that as long as we have the percentages logged.

Need a bit more feed back